GLIMS Journal of Management Review
and Transformation
issue front

Nidhi Singh1 and Kumarsawan Shakya2

First Published 24 Jun 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/jmrt.241240886
Article Information Volume 3, Issue 1 March 2024
Corresponding Author:

Nidhi Singh, ACE Business Consultants, Thane, Maharashtra 401107, India.
Email: nidhi@acebconsultants.com

1 ACE Business Consultants, Thane, Maharashtra, India

2 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

Abstract

This conceptual article attempts to trace the conceptual evolution of employee experience over the years. The article focuses on the changes in employee experience in response to the changes in the nature of work and the workplace. This article may inspire future researchers to explore variations in employee experience, and the factors contributing to the same. Practitioners and organisations can benefit by understanding and managing employee experience based on the nature of work and the workplace. We hope these insights enable managers to accentuate the employee experience in organisations.

Keywords

Employee experience, alienation, engagement

References

Artusi, F., & Bellini, E. (2022). From vision to innovation: new service development through front-line employee engagement. Innovation, 24(3), 433–458.

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds). (2010). Where to go from here: Integration and future research on work engagement. In Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 182–185). Psychology Press.

Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry. University of Chicago Press Ltd.

Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 77–101). Sage publications.

Erikson, K. (1986). On work and alienation. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 1–8.

Farndale, E., & Kelliher, C. (2013). Implementing performance appraisal: Exploring the employee experience. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 879–897.

Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.

Goffman, E. (1957). Alienation from interaction. Human Relations, 10(1), 47–60.

Han, S. H., Sung, M., & Suh, B. (2021). Linking meaningfulness to work outcomes through job characteristics and work engagement. Human Resource Development International, 24(1), 3–22.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

Kanungo, R. N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 56(1), 119–138.

Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 341–319.

Kanungo, R. N. (1983). Work alienation: A pancultural perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13, 119–138.

Kanungo, R. N. (1990). Culture and work alienation: Western models and eastern realities. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 795–812.

Kartal, N. (2018). Evaluating the relationship between work engagement, work alienation and work performance of healthcare professionals. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(3), 251–259.

Kompaso, S. M., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89.

Kong, F. Z., Zhao, L., Zhang, X. B., Tsai, C. H., & Lin, D. D. (2019). Farmers’ work-life quality and entrepreneurship will in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 787.

Lemon, L. L. (2019). The employee experience: How employees make meaning of employee engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 31(5–6), 176–199.

Mahoney, T. A., & Deckop, J. R. (1986). Evolution of concept and practice in personnel administration/human resource management (PA/HRM). Journal of Management, 12(2), 223–241.

Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Mohan, H., & Srikanth, N. R. (2022). Employee experience–the missing link for engaging employees: Insights from an MNE’s AI-based HR ecosystem. Human Resource Management, 62(1), 97–115.

Marques, T. M., Narciso, I., & Ferreira, L. C. (2022). How do family court judges theorize about parental alienation? A qualitative exploration of the territory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7555.

Mendonca, M., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Managing human resources: The issue of cultural fit. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3(2), 189–205.

Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486–500.

Nikolaidis, A. C. (2020). Concept proliferation as an educational good: Epistemic injustice, conceptual revolutions, and human flourishing. Educational Theory, 70(4), 463–482.

Nuvolari, A. (2019). Understanding successive industrial revolutions: A ‘development block’ approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 32, 33–44.

Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Wijhe, C. I. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(9), 1129–1154.

Pati, S. P., & Kumar, P. (2015). Work engagement & work alienation: Distinct or opposites? Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(1), 17–29.

Pillai, R., Ghanghorkar, Y., Sivathanu, B., Algharabat, R., & Rana, N. P. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) based employee experience (EEX) chatbots. Information Technology & People, 37(1), 449–478.

Rathee, R., & Sharma, V. (2019). Workplace spirituality as a predictor of employee engagement. In S. K. Mishra & A. Varma (Eds), Spirituality in Management: Insights from India (pp. 153–168). Springer.

Rayce, S. B., Kreiner, S., Damsgaard, M. T., Nielsen, T., & Holstein, B. E. (2018). Measurement of alienation among adolescents: Construct validity of three scales on powerlessness, meaninglessness and social isolation. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2(1), 1–12.

Sanaria, A. D. (2013). Exploring the conceptualization of work alienation in different cultural contexts. Proceeding of the International Conference on Marketing Paradigms in Emerging Economies at iFEEL, Lonavala, India, 16 Feb 2013, pp. 1–35.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783–791.

Seeman, M. (1967). On the personal consequences of alienation in work. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 273–285.

Seeman, M. (1972). Alienation and knowledge-seeking: A note on attitude and action. Social Problems, 20(1), 3–17.

Shantz, A., Alfes, K., Bailey, C., & Soane, E. (2015). Drivers and outcomes of work alienation: Reviving a concept. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 382–393.

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.

Tucker, E. (2020). Driving engagement with the employee experience. Strategic HR Review, 19(4), 183–187.

Von Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Historical coevolution of governance and technology in the industrial revolutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(4), 365–384.

Voth, H. J. (1996). Why did working hours increase in eighteenth-century London? Labour supply decisions and consumer durables during the industrial revolution (Working Papers 008). University of Oxford.

Welch, M. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: Communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 328–346.


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy