1 Thakur Institute of Management Studies & Research, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Thakur Global Business School, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
This research article explores the impact of neurotechnology on employee motivation and workplace productivity. With the growing integration of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and neurofeedback in professional settings, this study aims to understand whether these technologies can enhance cognitive performance, emotional regulation and focus—key elements that drive motivation and, in turn, boost productivity. Neurotechnology can positively influence employee motivation by optimising brain activity, ultimately leading to improved workplace performance. This study investigates the impact of neurotechnology—specifically BCIs and neurofeedback—on employee motivation and workplace productivity. Using a qualitative systematic literature review guided by PRISMA 2020, we reviewed 15 peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2025, primarily from Asian contexts. The findings reveal that neurotechnological tools can enhance cognitive performance, emotional regulation and attentional control, thereby positively influencing workplace motivation and productivity. However, ethical concerns regarding data privacy, consent and technostress present significant challenges. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for HR professionals and managers to ethically integrate neurotechnology into employee development strategies while ensuring psychological safety and informed consent.
Neurotechnology, systematic literature review, PRISMA 2020, brain–computer interface, neurofeedback, motivation–productivity link, HR technology
Ahmed, A. A., & Muhammed, R. A. (2021). Accessibility, use and effectiveness of neurotechnology devices for improved productivity in the workplace. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11(10), 15–22. https://doi.org/ 10.29322/IJSRP.11.10.2021.P11803
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/02683940710733115
Bonetti, F., & Casoni, G. (2024). Brain training, mindfulness, and wearables: Empowering employee wellbeing through neurotechnologies. Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, Digital Special Issue, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30682/diiddsi23t3e
Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 2(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457
Corr, P. J., McNaughton, N., Wilson, M. R., Hutchison, A., Burch, G. S. J., & Poropat, A. E. (2016). Neuroscience of motivation and organizational behaviour: Putting the reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) to work. In Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 43–70). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320160000019010
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Springer.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.5465/256657
Goering, S., Klein, E., Sullivan, L. S., Wexler, A., & Zuk, P. (2017). The ethics of brain-computer interfaces. Nature Biotechnology, 35(6), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3881
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Miller, S. L., Chelian, S. E., McBurnett, W., Tsou, W., & Kruse, A. A. (2019). An investigation of computer-based brain training on the cognitive and EEG performance of employees. In 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 518–521). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856758
Tindale, L. C., Chiu, D., Minielly, N., Hrincu, V., Talhouk, A., & Illes, J. (2022). Wearable biosensors in the workplace: Perceptions and perspectives. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 800367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.800367
Traunwieser, S. (2025). Neurodata-based headsets for the (digital) employee well-being: Responsibilities between benefit and harm. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2024-004