GLIMS Journal of Management Review and Transformation

Implementation of Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: Evidence from Indonesia

Tri Prabowo¹, Ann Martin-Sardesai², and James Guthrie AM³

First Published 2 Mar 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/jmrt.22.1023252

Article Information

Volume 1, Issue 1 March 2022

Corresponding Author:

Ann Marin-Sardesai, College of Business, School of Business and Law, CQUniversity Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Email:

¹Diponegoro University, Indonesia

²College of Business, School of Business and Law, CQUniversity Sydney, NSW, Australia

³Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Australia

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

Abstract

This article is inspired by complexities in the adoption and implementation of accrual accounting (AA), which has been explored in the public sector accounting literature, and seeks to examine its implementation in the Indonesian public sector. Using case-based research, the article is underpinned by Gramsci’s theory of hegemony to construe the process of the implementation of AA. The article adopts a qualitative research method including interviews with senior regulators of public sector reforms in Indonesia and an extensive review of documents, literature and reports to construct a historical analysis. The data reveal that international donor organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank influenced the implementation of AA in Indonesia. In line with Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, the international organizations directed the senior Indonesian regulators to perceive that AA was indispensable. Therefore, AA was implemented because of hegemonic influences and attempts to seek legitimacy. The empirical evidence provided identifies that major public sector reforms are complex. This is even more evident in new emerging market countries like Indonesia, where the intentions underpinning reforms may be challenging to realize and are driven by factors outside the control of those tasked with its adoption and implementation. The article is novel in identifying and interpreting the influence of the IMF, the World Bank, and other international organizations on the implementation of AA in Indonesia through the lens of Gramsci’s theory of hegemony.

Keywords

accrual accounting, government accounting standards, Indonesian public sector, hegemony, public sector reforms

References

Adhikari, P., & Mellemvik, F. (2011). The rise and fall of accruals: A case of Nepalese central government. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(2), 123–143.

Adler, E., & Haas, P. M. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization, 46(01), 367–390.

Alawattage, C., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2008). Appearance of accounting in a political hegemony. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(3), 293–339.

Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. Global Civil Society, 2001, 3–22.

Annisette, M. (2004). The true nature of the World Bank. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(3), 303–323.

Baker, R., & Rennie, M. (2006). Forces leading to the adoption of accrual accounting by the Canadian Federal Government: An institutional perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 5(1), 83–112.

Buhr, N. (2012). Accrual accounting by Anglo-American governments: Motivations, developments and some tensions over the last 30 years. Accounting History, 17(3–4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1032373212443956

Cahill, D. (2008). Hegemony and the neoliberal historical bloc. The Australian experience. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

Carlin, T. (2005). Debating the impact of accrual accounting and reporting in the public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), 309-336.

Cerny, P. G. (1992). Conceptual confrontation. In M. Haugaard & H. H. Lentner (Eds.), Hegemony and power: Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.

Chan, J. (2006). IPSAS and government accounting reform in developing countries. Accounting reform in the public sector: Mimicry, fad or necessity (pp. 31–42). Experts Comptables Media.

Christensen, M. (2002). Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales government. Accounting History, 7(1), 93–124.

Christensen, M. (2005). The ‘third hand’: Private sector consultants in public sector accounting change. The European Accounting Review, 14(3), 447–474.

Cooper, C., Neu, D., & Lehman, G. (2003). Globalisation and its discontents: A concern about growth and globalization. Accounting Forum, 27(4), 359–364.

Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175.

Davidson, A. (2008). Hegemony, language, and popular wisdom in the Asia-Pacific. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

Davis, P. R., & McGregor, J. A. (2000). Civil society, international donors and poverty in Bangladesh. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 38(1), 47–64.

Diamond, J. (2002). The strategy of budget system reform in emerging countries. Public Finance and Management, 2(3), 358–386.

Ellwood, S. (2002). The financial reporting (r)evolution in the UK public sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(4), 565–594.

Ellwood, S., & Newberry, S. (2007). Public sector accrual accounting: Institutionalising neo-liberal principles? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20( 4), 549–573.

Engel, S. (2008). The World Bank and neoliberal hegemony in Vietnam. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

Femia, J. (1975). Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of Antonio Gramsci. Political studies, 23(1), 29–48.

Femia, J. V. (1981). An historicist critique of “revisionist” methods for studying the history of ideas. History and Theory, 20(2), 113–134.

Femia, J. V. (1987). Gramsci’s political thought: Hegemony, consciousness, and the revolutionary process. Oxford Scholarship Online.

Fontana, B. (1992). State and society: The concept of hegemony in Gramsci. In M. Haugaard & H. H. Lentner (Eds.), Hegemony and power. Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. Rowman & Littlefield.

Fontana, B. (2008). Hegemony and power in Gramsci. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

Garner, R. (2007). Social theory: Continuity + confrontation a reader (2nd ed.). True to Type.

Gillis, P. L. (2011). The big four in China: Hegemony and counter hegemony in the development of the accounting profession in China. Macquarie University.

Goddard, A. (2002). Development of the accounting profession and practices in the public sector – a hegemonic analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(5), 655–688. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/journals.htm?articleid=869841&show=abstract#sthash.N25a7LPC.dpuf

Guthrie, J. (Ed.) (1998). A critique of the application of accrual accounting to the public sector. Allen & Unwin.

Harun, H., Peursem, K. v., & Eggleton, I. (2012). Institutionalization of accrual accounting in the Indonesian public sector. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 8(3), 257–285.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Hattori, T. (2003). Giving as a mechanism of consent: International aid organizations and the ethical hegemony of capitalism. International Relations, 17(2), 153–173.

Haugaard, M. (1992). Power and hegemony in social theory. In M. Haugaard & H. H. Lentner (Eds.), Hegemony and power. Consensus and coercion in contemporary politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.

Hoare, Q., & Smith, G. N. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.

Howell, J. (2000). Making civil society from the outside challenges for donors. The European Journal of Development Research, 12(1), 3–22.

Howson, R., & Smith, K. (2008). Hegemony and the operation of consensus and coercion. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

James, O., & Manning, N. (1996). Public management reform: A global perspective. Politics, 16(3), 143–149.

Jones, S. (2006). Antonio Gramsci. Routledge.

Katz, H. (2006). Gramsci, hegemony, and global civil society networks. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(4), 333–348.

Koike, O. (2000, June 21). New public management in Japan and Southeast Asian countries: A magic sword for governance reform? [Paper presentation]. The IIAS/Japan Joint Panel on Public Administration, Bologna, Italy.

Laughlin, R., & Pallot, J. (1998). Trends, patterns and influencing factors: Some reflections. In O. Olson, J. Guthrie, & C. Humphrey (Eds.), Global warning! Debating international development in new public financial management. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

Matsuda, H., & Ohara, K. (2008). Hegemony and the elaboration of the process of subalternity. In R. Howson & K. Smith (Eds.), Hegemony: Studies in consensus and coercion. Routledge.

Mueller, J. L. (2011). The IMF, neoliberalism and hegemony. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 25(3), 377–402.

Prabowo, T. (2015). Financial reporting in the public sector - An Indonesian study [PhD thesis]. Macquarie University.

Prabowo, T., Leung, P., & Guthrie, J. (2018). Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): Confusions in implementation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(1), 2–21.

Prawiro, R. (1987). Reforming financial management in government: The Indonesian agenda. International Journal of Government Auditing, 14(1), 9–17.

Rosser, A. (1999). The political economy of accounting reform in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Asia Research Center, Murdoch University.

Rupert, M. (2000). Ideologies of globalization: Contending visions of new world order. Routledge.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). Harper and Brother.

Simon, R. (1991). Gramsci’s political thought: An introduction. Lawrence & Wishart.

Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2010). Neoliberalism, a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its dicontents. W.W. Norton and Company.

Timoshenko, K., & Adhikari, P. (2009). Exploring Russian central government accounting in its context. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5(4), 490–513.

Turner, M. (2002). Choosing items from the menu: New public management in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1493–1512.

World Bank. (1988). The Bank’s World. World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/464531468914671096/pdf/587090NEWS0Ban10BOX354961B010101-88.pdf

Yee, H. (2009). The re-emergence of the public accounting profession in China: A hegemonic analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(1), 71–92.